Sophie is unwell – a stomach bug. We have been very fortunate to have dodged
that bullet until now. We are not
extremely careful about what we eat. I feel compelled to stay in while she
convalesces so, unfortunately, that means more blogs. Sorry.
The images are of urban decay. Taken in Valparaiso, not Santiago. You can't help but feel the pain when you examine the content. We realized we were in 'the wrong part of Valparaiso' just after I took the last one. You don't venture into those hills with a camera and a wallet we were warned... Still, my angels looked after us and there were no incidents.
![]() |
Vomito is prolific in Valpo |
I've taken some jaunts out into Santiago and formed some
impressions. Aside from the lumps of poverty that we find there is much to
admire about both Buenos Aires and Santiago in terms of intentional
design. Latin cities tend to have a
central square – sometimes called a Plaza des Armes, sometimes a Zocalo. These
verdant gathering spots form the nucleus of exterior social engagement in many
towns and cities. Of course a city like
Santiago has many different squares and parks.
It is mind-bogglingly (?) immense and not without its design flaws. For instance, different neighbouring jurisdictions
within the greater city of Santiago fail to harmonize with respect to road
construction and design so major arteries suddenly disappear or shift radically. Who needs earthquakes when you can’t agree
with your neighbour where your roads should meet? The locals have accommodated
themselves to these vagaries but it is stressful to the visitor.
The subways in Santiago are as different from those in
Buenos Aires as New York’s are from Paris (in the reverse order). They are modern, well-lit with wide platforms
for crowds. The cars are well-lit, clean
-and air-conditioned. The Buenos Subte felt medieval. Though there was some
nice ceramic work in several of the stations it was filthy, dark, usually hot
and the cars were always crowded – any time of day. Santiago’s appears to be an
efficient and well-designed system.
Other public transit is also important here and if it weren’t for the
fact that it takes a degree in logistics to work out which bus to take we would
probably use them as well.
Another thing we observe even in rather small towns in Chile
is the pedestrian mall. The one in downtown
Santiago is immense, covering many city blocks.
Cars are not allowed except thru a few lateral streets. The wide walkways – formerly known as streets
– are tiled and have planters with immense trees and shrubs. It’s very appealing and makes this part of
the city extremely hospitable. The malls
appear to benefit both pedestrian and merchant because it all feels very
vibrant and healthy. When I consider
cities I am familiar with in Canada I can’t really lay the same template over a
sector and imagine it working.
Yorkville? Well that’s too
elitist - too monocultural with respect to income bracket and commerce – where would
the fishmongers go, the shoe repair, the fruit and vegetable stalls? Kensington
Market? How would they carry on all the
stocking of produce etc. with no ready access for service vehicles. I suppose it remains to us to take the plunge
and see what happens. Air pollution
seems much less in these malls and there is a pervasive sense of community;
however illusory that might be. Oakville
could probably pull it off but they would have to open space for the x-mongers.
I don’t see Oakvillians tolerating smelly fish and rotting vegetables. But the prejudices against those things –
decay, a bit of olafactory offense – deny us the huge benefits of communing
with our neighbours, making new connections and enjoying a richer, more complex
way of living – and artisanal fare.
In my imagined future, where Buckminster Fuller-esque domes
of one-molecule-thick carbon material hover over tracts of our cold cities, we
could have public market spaces and even zocalos with climates adjusted to
accommodate sub-tropical verdure and we could walk and conduct our commerce
without losing an appendage to the bitter cold.
While I’m at it let’s add some elevated public transport systems that
magically don’t offend the airspace of residents below and make no noise. Throw in some elevated bike corridors that easily
convert from open-air to covered. Toronto is filling up and in. With greater density we must ensure that
there is a safety valve that provides for communal experience and ease of
use. Otherwise we will rot at the core
like some of the places we are traveling through. Canadian cities are precious. Winnipeg has its challenges but it was a
fantastic place to grow up in and it still has a very workable scale. Could we harness mosquitoes to pull the buses
around? Montreal could be one of the
world’s jewels because of its quasi-European qualities and excellent
hairdressers and, unlike Toronto, it has a hill. Vancouver has natural beauty up the wazoo –
where does it make an adjustment to make it affordable? Sorry Moncton. You’re screwed.
![]() |
If I can not reform it is not my revolution |
We are looking at extreme change in our near future. Finance systems will be overhauled, globalism
will have both positive and negative effects on our economies. Immigration will
infuse our cities with a rich admixture of cultural diversity and potential
friction. When will our youth become adequately and proportionally employed to
match their magnificent skillsets and education? Unemployment is, here, clearly the most
significant problem in large urban centres. How will change take place – what will
change to reboot our nearly lifeless economy?
(I am saying this because I am witnessing so much more passion and
industry in these developing countries.
I recognize that many of you are hard-working, creative folk so no
offense meant). Traveling through less advantaged parts of the world one can’t
help but notice the hunger and energy that the citizens here exhibit. (also the
hopelessness and sloth of the unemployed). We are slack and less fit
philosophically regarding work in Canada I think – having enjoyed plucking the
low-hanging fruit that we have come to believe is our natural advantage. But the world is huge and teeming with tough,
hungry fish. We don’t compete with our neighbours or with the United States any
more – the world is opening up and we need to be prepared by being excellent and
highly creative in our craft and purpose.
So the city planners for these cities had a better idea - with
generous public spaces for commerce and interaction. Can Canadian cities retrofit to accommodate
this ideal? Let’s see. All Problems are Design Problems. Again and
again I see that what we tend to regard as injurious to our economy or social
well-being (environmental rehabilitation, social support, alternative energy,
sustainable agriculture, decriminalization of most drugs) turns out to have a
positive impact across sectors (not just economic). Why do we keep running from the challenge we
have ahead? Why aren’t we plunging into the future with ideas and innovations and knives, forks and spoons to solve the existing and anticipated problems and thereby steal the march on
other countries who we are competing with who are facing the same issues? Easy for me to say, I’m not putting the
capital in....But I believe that opportunity lies explicitly where the problems are.
![]() |
Very piratical wall - maybe meant as a warning |